Know more

Our use of cookies

Cookies are a set of data stored on a user’s device when the user browses a web site. The data is in a file containing an ID number, the name of the server which deposited it and, in some cases, an expiry date. We use cookies to record information about your visit, language of preference, and other parameters on the site in order to optimise your next visit and make the site even more useful to you.

To improve your experience, we use cookies to store certain browsing information and provide secure navigation, and to collect statistics with a view to improve the site’s features. For a complete list of the cookies we use, download “Ghostery”, a free plug-in for browsers which can detect, and, in some cases, block cookies.

Ghostery is available here for free:

You can also visit the CNIL web site for instructions on how to configure your browser to manage cookie storage on your device.

In the case of third-party advertising cookies, you can also visit the following site:, offered by digital advertising professionals within the European Digital Advertising Alliance (EDAA). From the site, you can deny or accept the cookies used by advertising professionals who are members.

It is also possible to block certain third-party cookies directly via publishers:

Cookie type

Means of blocking

Analytical and performance cookies

Google Analytics

Targeted advertising cookies


The following types of cookies may be used on our websites:

Mandatory cookies

Functional cookies

Social media and advertising cookies

These cookies are needed to ensure the proper functioning of the site and cannot be disabled. They help ensure a secure connection and the basic availability of our website.

These cookies allow us to analyse site use in order to measure and optimise performance. They allow us to store your sign-in information and display the different components of our website in a more coherent way.

These cookies are used by advertising agencies such as Google and by social media sites such as LinkedIn and Facebook. Among other things, they allow pages to be shared on social media, the posting of comments, and the publication (on our site or elsewhere) of ads that reflect your centres of interest.

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) uses CAS and PHP session cookies and the New Relic cookie for monitoring purposes (IP, response times).

These cookies are deleted at the end of the browsing session (when you log off or close your browser window)

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) uses the XiTi cookie to measure traffic. Our service provider is AT Internet. This company stores data (IPs, date and time of access, length of the visit and pages viewed) for six months.

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) does not use this type of cookie.

For more information about the cookies we use, contact INRA’s Data Protection Officer by email at or by post at:

24, chemin de Borde Rouge –Auzeville – CS52627
31326 Castanet Tolosan CEDEX - France

Dernière mise à jour : Mai 2018

Menu Logo Principal Plant pathology unit - INRA AVIGNON

Pathologie vegetale

Zone de texte éditable et éditée et rééditée


Virologist and modeller in epidemiology and evolution

Since 1st September 2018, I have been working as a Research Scientist in the team ‘Virology’ of the Plant Pathology Research Unit (INRA, Avignon). My main research interest focus on the identification of efficient and durable strategies to manage plant diseases and especially those caused by viruses on vegetable crops



Unité de Recherches de Pathologie Végétale


Domaine St Maurice BP 94
67, allée des chênes
CS 60094
F84143 Montfavet cedex

Tel : 33 (0)



My publications in the open archive HAL INRAE



Loup Rimbaud: using maths and biology to solve plant disease problems(INRAE Press, 2019/06/05) 


I use spatiotemporal simulationmodels, complemented with laboratory and glasshouse experiments, as well as statistical analyses of epidemiological data. These experiments and field data result in the acquisition of crucial knowledge on the biology of the interactions between host plants, pathogens and possibly their vectors. Indeed, these knowledge give the possibility to calibrate model parameters or test model predictions, and can be very helpful to identify promising control methods. Finally, it is crucial for me to identify strategies that match with farmers’ needs, and communicate them in such a way that my researches have an impact on the real world.

1. Modelling control strategies of epidemics

Simulation models are very useful to optimise management strategies of epidemics, and circumvent the ethical, legal, logistical and economic constraints associated with experiments at large spatiotemporal scales. My models simulate the epidemiological dynamics of pathogens in cultivated landscapes under disease management, and aim at optimising management strategies. However, pathogens have an extraordinary evolutionary potential that allow them to overcome control methods employed in the field. This is particularly the case with the deployment of plant resistance. Thus, because they include pathogen evolution, the demo-genetic models I use are of great interest, and enable the identification of strategies that are both efficient and durable to manage plant diseases.

Modelling control strategies of epidemics

In collaboration with the BioSP unit (INRAE Avignon) and CSIRO (Canberra, Australia), I contributed to the development of the R package landsepi (Landscape Epidemiology and Evolution). This package allows the simulation of a panel of resistance deployment strategies against plant pathogens, and compare the following strategies:

  • Gene pyramiding in the genome of a single cultivar
  • Rotation of resistant cultivars on the same field
  • Mixture of resistant cultivars in the same field
  • Mosaic of resistant cultivars at the landscape scale

One of the first conclusions of this work is that there is no universal strategy for all pathogens and all situations: the optimal strategy depends, among others, on the considered pathosystems, the epidemiological and evolutionary context and the desired objectives (epidemiological efficiency, evolutionary durability, economic cost-effectiveness, …). We are currently developing a shiny interface for pedagogical purposes.

→ Click on the images to enlarge

Examples of simulated landscapes allocated with a 3-cultivar mosaic

Examples of simulated landscapes allocated with a 3-cultivar mosaic. An algorithm controls the relative proportion and degree of spatial aggregation of the different cultivars.

(From Rimbaud L, Papaïx J, Rey JF, Barrett LG and Thrall PH (2018). Assessing the durability and efficiency of landscape-based strategies to deploy plant resistance to pathogens. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14:e1006067

SEIR architecture of the model

SEIR architecture of the model. Healthy hosts can be infected by propagules. Following a latent period, infectious hosts produce new propagules which may mutate and disperse across the landscape. At the end of the infectious period, infected hosts become epidemiologically inactive.

(Adapted from Rimbaud L, Papaïx J, Barrett LG, Burdon JJ and Thrall PH (2018). Mosaics, mixtures, rotations or pyramiding: What is the optimal strategy to deploy major gene resistance? Evol. Appl. 11(10):1791-1810.

2. Experimental calibration of models

A fine understanding of the biology of interaction between pathogens, hosts and vectors is necessary to identify relevant control strategies. Resistance is an interesting way to inhibit these interactions. Plant resistance is a decrease (possibly complete) in the ability of the parasite to infect, colonise or exploit the host for its own development. Numerous molecular mechanisms of plant resistance to pathogens have been elucidated, however very few data are available to understand the effect of such resistances on the main steps of parasitic infectious cycles. Such data are essential to calibrate simulations models (for example steps 1 to 4 of the SEIR architecture, see above) destined to evaluate different types of varietal resistance. Using  Potato virus Y (Potyviridae, potyvirus) and Cucumber mosaic virus (Bromoviridae, cucumovirus), my experiments aim at assessing different types of resistance to viruses in pepper (Capsicum annuum).

Experimental calibration of models

Our first results show that the aphid-mediated PVY infection rate (step 1) is slightly lower in a resistant accession (Perennial) than in a susceptible accession (Yolo Wonder). Nevertheless, this difference is too small to explain why Perennial is so resistant in the field; this accession must certainly affect other steps of the viral infectious cycle.

3. Transfer of knowledge

  • Teaching (Master 2)
    • Université Paris-Saclay : De l’Agronomie à l’AgroEcologie (AAE).
    • Montpellier SupAgro : Protection des Plantes et Environnement (PPE). Amélioration des plantes et ingénierie des plantes tropicales et méditerranéennes (APIMET).
  • Internship supervision (Master 2)
    • 2020 Pierre Mustin (main supervisor): Evaluation of plant resistance to viral transmission
    • 2020 Clarisse Vincent (co-supervisor) : Maintaining resistance durability to black sigatoka in new banana cultivar
    • 2019 Jean-Loup Gaussen (co-supervisor): Development of spatial tools for the R package landsepi
    • 2014 Samuel Marchat (co-supervisor): Development of an early detection protocol for the virus responsible of sharka in prunus trees