Know more

Our use of cookies

Cookies are a set of data stored on a user’s device when the user browses a web site. The data is in a file containing an ID number, the name of the server which deposited it and, in some cases, an expiry date. We use cookies to record information about your visit, language of preference, and other parameters on the site in order to optimise your next visit and make the site even more useful to you.

To improve your experience, we use cookies to store certain browsing information and provide secure navigation, and to collect statistics with a view to improve the site’s features. For a complete list of the cookies we use, download “Ghostery”, a free plug-in for browsers which can detect, and, in some cases, block cookies.

Ghostery is available here for free: https://www.ghostery.com/fr/products/

You can also visit the CNIL web site for instructions on how to configure your browser to manage cookie storage on your device.

In the case of third-party advertising cookies, you can also visit the following site: http://www.youronlinechoices.com/fr/controler-ses-cookies/, offered by digital advertising professionals within the European Digital Advertising Alliance (EDAA). From the site, you can deny or accept the cookies used by advertising professionals who are members.

It is also possible to block certain third-party cookies directly via publishers:

Cookie type

Means of blocking

Analytical and performance cookies

Realytics
Google Analytics
Spoteffects
Optimizely

Targeted advertising cookies

DoubleClick
Mediarithmics

The following types of cookies may be used on our websites:

Mandatory cookies

Functional cookies

Social media and advertising cookies

These cookies are needed to ensure the proper functioning of the site and cannot be disabled. They help ensure a secure connection and the basic availability of our website.

These cookies allow us to analyse site use in order to measure and optimise performance. They allow us to store your sign-in information and display the different components of our website in a more coherent way.

These cookies are used by advertising agencies such as Google and by social media sites such as LinkedIn and Facebook. Among other things, they allow pages to be shared on social media, the posting of comments, and the publication (on our site or elsewhere) of ads that reflect your centres of interest.

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) uses CAS and PHP session cookies and the New Relic cookie for monitoring purposes (IP, response times).

These cookies are deleted at the end of the browsing session (when you log off or close your browser window)

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) uses the XiTi cookie to measure traffic. Our service provider is AT Internet. This company stores data (IPs, date and time of access, length of the visit and pages viewed) for six months.

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) does not use this type of cookie.

For more information about the cookies we use, contact INRA’s Data Protection Officer by email at cil-dpo@inra.fr or by post at:

INRA
24, chemin de Borde Rouge –Auzeville – CS52627
31326 Castanet Tolosan CEDEX - France

Dernière mise à jour : Mai 2018

Menu Institut Sophia Agrobiotech Logo Marque Etat - République Française Logo_INRAE_noir Logo Université Côte d'Azur CNRS

Home page

Institut Sophia Agrobiotech

UMR INRA - Univ. Nice Sophia Antipolis - Cnrs

http://www.paca.inra.fr/institut-sophia-agrobiotech_eng/

Biological Control

10 July 2017

Biological Control
© 2017 Elsevier B.V.
Intraspecific variation in facultative symbiont infection among native and exotic pest populations: potential implications for biological control

Abstract

Facultative bacterial symbionts can provide their host insects with protection from natural enemies. These symbionts are often found at low to intermediate frequencies among hosts in native populations, suggesting that fewer symbiont taxa (and their corresponding defensive properties) may be present in exotic populations, due to founder effects and drift in newly established populations. We tested this hypothesis by collecting aphid species from their exotic and native regions, and conducting diagnostic surveys for four facultative symbionts: Hamiltonella defensa, Regiella insecticola, Serratia symbiotica, and Arsenophonus nasoniae. We did not find fewer symbiont taxa in exotic host populations, but did find substantial intra- and interpopulation variation in symbiont infection. When we incorporated additional records from the literature, we found moderate support for the hypothesis, although few aphid species were sampled sufficiently to be conclusive. Finally, we tested whether laboratory colonies are prone to losing symbiont infection over time. We established four colonies of the cowpea aphid, Aphis craccivora, each initiated with a single aphid clone infected with H. defensa. Through repeated sampling, we found that all four colonies became uninfected over the course of one year. We suggest that symbiont surveys could aid importation biological control introductions by (1) establishing whether recently established exotic pest populations might have reduced symbiont complements and be particularly vulnerable to natural enemies, (2) providing clues on pest provenance, and (3) determining which native pest populations include the same defensive symbionts as the exotic target populations, as these may be the best sources for prospective agents. We also suggest that laboratory cultures of target and nontarget organisms be routinely monitored for symbiont composition, to ensure that laboratory trials produce field-relevant results.

Keywords

  • aphids;
  • Aphis craccivora;
  • Endosymbiont;
  • Hamiltonella defensa;
  • Importation biological control;
  • Invasive species

Desneux, N., Asplen, M.K., Brady, C.M., Heimpel, G.E., Hopper, K.R., Luo, C., Monticelli, L., Oliver, K.M., and White, J.A. (2018). Intraspecific variation in facultative symbiont infection among native and exotic pest populations: Potential implications for biological control. Biological Control 116, 27–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.06.007

Site : View online >>